maddy truelove b.~1900 OK/indian territory
i didn’t find a maddy. but i did find some trueloves in the 1920 census. is this your relative?
1920 United States Federal Census
about Mattie C Truelove
Name: Mattie C Truelove
Home in 1920: South Wichita, Lincoln, Oklahoma
Age: 8
Estimated birth year: abt 1912
Birthplace: Oklahoma
Relation to Head of House: Daughter
Father’s Name: James D
Father’s Birth Place: Georgia
Mother’s Name: Katie A
Mother’s Birth Place: Texas
Marital Status: Single
Race: White
Sex: Female
Able to read: Yes
Able to Write: Yes
Neighbors: View others on page
Household Members:
Name Age
James D Truelove 47
Katie A Truelove 37
Ethel M Truelove 18
Thomas M Truelove 15
Charley L Truelove 11
Mattie C Truelove 8
Ellis E Truelove 3
[3 6/12]
Source Citation: Year: 1920;Census Place: South Wichita, Lincoln, Oklahoma; Roll T625_1470; Page: 9B; Enumeration District: 132; Image: 61.
if so, then james and katie would have been alive at the time of the dawes roll 1896-1906. and ethel was born in 1902, so if the family applied, ethel would probably be on the dawes roll as well.
maybe this is your james:
Dawes Card Information
tribe last first middle age sex blood card roll misc type
Choctaw Truelove Dora 0 F MCR6152 P
Choctaw Truelove Edom 0 M MCR6152 P
Choctaw Truelove James 37 M 1/2 MCR6152 NR MUSKOGEE MCR
this is the family group, if it is your james. p=parent. mcr=mississippi choctaw refused.
it says james was 37 when he applied for enrollment, which would have been 57 or so in 1920, so i am not sure it’s the same person.
back to the 1920 census:
i’m seeing katie was b. TX and james b. GA. that would indicate that the family is likely not enrolled, that they might be mississippi choctaw. the trail of tears in the late 1830’s didn’t go through texas.
katie’s parents were b. indiana and illinois,, not looking like a native heritage there.
james was b. GA and parents b. GA. this could be a late migration.
bear in mind that the oklahoma land rushes and new business opportunities caused many to migrate to indian territory in the late 1890’s, early 1900’s. oklahoma became a state in 1907.
all children were b. OK in this report.
i can’t check anything else because you didn’t give a spouse name, no dates, no location, no parents.
genealogists use names, dates, locations, children and spouses to match records. if
you have a common surname, you need to give more information rather thann less. if
you post about women, it is helpful to include the maiden name and the married name
and designate which one is the maiden name.
first of all, heritage and tribal enrollment are two different things. many times
natives didn’t apply for enrollment because 1) they didn’t qualify, 2) they were
philosophically opposed to enrollment, 3) they didn’t have documentation, or 4) they
were mississippi choctaw and their ancestor had accepted land or benefits in lieu of
tribal enrollment.
the dawes roll was taken 1896-1906, so you should trace your ancestors down to that
time period. mostly, they had to be living in oklahoma by that time and agree to live
there permanently.
if the name is common, you may find too many possible records.
the tribe has an excellent information to help you. it is found under genealogy
advocacy.
http://choctawnation.com/services/departments/community-services/
i am just a volunteer that wants to empower people to learn how to do genealogy.
suzanne hamlet shatto